Wednesday, August 18, 2010

8/18/2010 - http://www.zerohedge.com/article/goldman-tells-its-special-clients-sell-gold-even-it-raises-its-price-target-shiny-metal

Goldman Tells Its "Special" Clients To Sell Gold Even As It Raises Its Price Target On The Shiny Metal

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 08/18/2010 10:19 -0500



A week ago Goldman raised its price target on gold to $1,300/ounce, an action which judging by the firm's historical record of putting its clients' interest in its rightful last place, led us to be skeptical: "The report will likely result in a brief pop in spot as the idiot money rushes into the latest Goldman trap. Alas, it also means that GS is now offloading. Be very wary of market dynamics over the next month." Today we realize our skepticism was perfectly justified: in the latest Perspectives from Goldman Sachs Asset Management (intended FOR BROKER-DEALER, FINANCIAL INSTITUTION, OR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY. NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO CLIENTS OR THE GENERAL PUBLIC), in addition to summarizing all the other recent actions presented by the firm's key departments, way in the back, in very small print when discussing commodities, the letter author notes: "Shifted our stance on gold after years of being long; see gold as vulnerable to Central Bank inactivity in the face of rising deflation risk." Once again, those who bet that Goldman does precisely the opposite of what it tells clients to do, win.
 
"The Hindenburg Omen" strikes again
First identified by Jim Miekka, the Omen plays on the logic that the bulls and the bears can’t possibly both be right — which, in an odd way, describes where the markets are stuck right now.
This scenario is triggered by the divergence of the number of stocks making new highs versus those making new lows. 
In other words, the absence of uniformity in sentiment creates the condition of the Omen.
The traditional definition of a Hindenburg Omen has five criteria (per Wikipedia):
  1. The daily number of NYSE new 52 Week Highs and the daily number of new 52 Week Lows must both be greater than 2.2 percent of total NYSE issues traded that day.
  2. The smaller of these numbers must be greater than or equal to 69 (68.772 is 2.2% of 3126). This is more of a checksum than a rule. This condition is a function of the 2.2% of the total issues.
  3. The NYSE 10 Week moving average must be rising.
  4. The McClellan Oscillator must be negative on that same day.
  5. New 52 Week Highs cannot be more than twice the new 52 Week Lows (however, it's fine for new 52 Week Lows to be more than double new 52 Week Highs). This condition is absolutely mandatory.
Meeting these conditions, the occurrence of all five criteria on one day is often referred to as an unconfirmed Hindenburg Omen.
A confirmed Hindenburg Omen, meanwhile, occurs if a second (or more) Hindenburg Omen occurs during a 36-day period from the first signal.
According to the data, this resulted in an unconfirmed Omen last Thursday — a mere one day after nearly triggering it the day before.
On Wednesday, only 67 stocks hit new lows as opposed to the required 69.
Ever since then, the Street has been abuzz with references to fiery crashes.
So what does it all mean?
Probably not much on the face of it... Prior Omens have come and gone without causing much of a market stir.
But looking back at the historical data, the technical signal has indeed been present in every NYSE crash since 1985.
That being said, here’s the rest of the historical breakdown in the aftermath of a confirmed Hindenburg Omen:
  • A 77% probability of 5% move to the downside;
  • A 41% probability of a panic sellout, down 10-15%;
  • A 24% probability of a stock market crash, down greater than 15%.
And here’s another stat that might just give you goose bumps... According to Barron’s, the Hindenburg Omen appeared in June 2008 when the Dow was trading at 11800 — a mere three months before the big September crash.
chart pattern worse than the Omen
Whether obscure or not, this is one signal to watch — especially if Thursday’s occurrence is confirmed. After all, the gulf between the bulls and bears has never been wider.
And while I know that all of that sounds a bit crazy, it does seem to jive with the a chart that I have been watching for months now.
It’s the weekly chart of the Dow, and it's more worrisome than any Omen. Here's why...
The chart seems to be forming the final leg of the head and shoulders top we have been warning Wealth Advisory subscribers about for months now. It's one of the reasons we were selling stocks as the DOW revisited the 10700 level.
Take a look:
handsweekly
So what does a classic head and shoulders top look like?
As depicted above, the classic head and shoulders top looks like a human head with shoulders on either side of the head. It's what's known as a topping pattern.
The first point (1) — the left shoulder — occurs as the price level in a rising market hits a high and then falls back. The second point (2) — the head — happens when price levels rise to an even higher high before retreating back to support at the prior low. The third point (3) — the right shoulder — occurs when price levels rise again but the market loses steam, failing to rise above the head.
The key to the pattern, however, is the neckline formed by the previous support, since the pattern is complete when the neck line is broken.
This occurs when the price level falls from the high point of the right shoulder and moves below the neckline. Technical analysts will often say that the pattern is not confirmed until the price closes below the neckline — it is not enough for it to trade below the neckline.
Calculating the downside target then is just a simple matter of the math. To figure it out, you subtract the high of the head (roughly 11200) by its distance to the neckline of 9700.
That gives you a figure of 1500 points. You then subtract that same 1500 from the 9700 neckline to arrive at your new downside target.
Hindenburg Omen aside, what this all means is if completed, the DOW would fall as low as 8200.
Oh, the humanity

 http://www.zerohedge.com/article/goldman-tells-its-special-clients-sell-gold-even-it-raises-its-price-target-shiny-metal

No comments:

Post a Comment